<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ClickJacking &#8211; The New Browser Security Threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.misec.net/2008/09/30/clickjacking-the-new-browser-security-threat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.misec.net/2008/09/30/clickjacking-the-new-browser-security-threat/</link>
	<description>The latest in security - from the developers of TrojanHunter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.misec.net/2008/09/30/clickjacking-the-new-browser-security-threat/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misec.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Haha, a few months back I was discussing adsense with a friend and I suggested something similar to this; Covering adverts with an image that &quot;tricked&quot; the user into clicking the advert. I&#039;m surprised it took so long for this to come about, I presumed, at the time, this was already a known thing and it was done. I guess not, I must be ahead of the times :</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, a few months back I was discussing adsense with a friend and I suggested something similar to this; Covering adverts with an image that &#8220;tricked&#8221; the user into clicking the advert. I&#8217;m surprised it took so long for this to come about, I presumed, at the time, this was already a known thing and it was done. I guess not, I must be ahead of the times :</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
